Frederik Kaiser (1808-1872) and the
modernisation of Dutch astronomy

by Petra van der Heijden


Frederik Kaiser (1808-1872)

Introduction

At the beginning of the 19th century, astronomy at the Dutch universities was at a low ebb. The universities had no observing programme, and astronomical instruments, if there, were mostly used for educational purposes. Already in the 18th century the practice of astronomy had slowly shifted towards the amateurs, who were mostly members of a learned society or had a wealthy patron to provide them with the necessary tools.
In this tradition the young Frederik Kaiser was raised. Educated by his uncle Johan Frederik Keyser (1766-1823), who was a proficient amateur astronomer, Kaiser proved to be a real observational talent. This talent brought him the first paid-for post of observer in the country. Famous for his observations of Halley's comet, in 1837 he became director of Leiden Observatory, and in 1845 a full professor. His broad approach of astronomy was quite unique.

Science
Leiden Observatory's meridian circle in 1861. 
The little box with chimney contains an oil lamp which lights the 
scale on the circles. Photograph by Kaiser's son P.J. Kaiser
Like many of his foreign contemporaries, Kaiser concentrated his research on positional astronomy. Measuring the positions and motions of stars and solar system bodies (e.g. comets) with increasing precision was a major task for astronomy in those days.
The meridian or transit circle was used to record the exact moment an object crossed the meridian of the observatory. It originated from the old mural quadrant or circle combined with a small transit telescope. The altitude of the object could be read from the circle. A wire micrometer was used to determine the angle between two objects.
Kaiser was the first to introduce this type of precision measurement in Dutch astronomy. His observations soon rivalled with the best in the world. Otto W. Struve (1819-1905), after having received Kaiser's measurements, in 1842 wrote:

``I am honestly grateful for your wonderful gift, and I assure you I have read it with the greatest interest (...) This interest increased when I became convinced of the excellence of your micrometer measurements, which are so fine that they leave the rest behind. I am pleased to see that, in order to reach excellence, talent and industry are as important as, no even more important than colossal dimensions of a telescope.''

Organisation

When he was still an observer, for many years Kaiser had worked in a poorly equipped institute on top of the Leiden University academy building, knowing that he would not get anywhere without new, state-of-the-art instruments. But getting these meant struggling with authorities. From 1837 on, Kaiser always dedicated a fairly large amount of his time to this problem.
In 1861 his efforts finally gained him a brand new, fully equipped observatory building, the first of its kind in the Netherlands, along with a staff of observers. This institute gave Dutch astronomy a prominent place on the world map.

Leiden Observatory around 1865, seen from the southeast


Popularisation
Kaiser's `Sterrenhemel' was first published in 1844. This is the 2nd volume, 4th edition from 1888, updated by J.A.C. Oudemans
Kaiser's activities were not confined to professional astronomy only. It was his aim to disclose the science of astronomy to the general public. He considered it an essential element of a broad education, and used it as a means to demonstrate the greatness and beauty of creation.
Kaiser became well known for his spellbinding lectures in popular astronomy and his articles in popular magazines. His greatest achievement is probably the writing of De Sterrenhemel (1844-1845), an overview of astronomical theory and practice for the layman. It appeared in four editions and was translated into German and Danish.
Naturally, Kaiser's fame was of great benefit in raising the funds for a new observatory.

Goal

This project will search for a historical understanding of Kaiser's ideas and actions in the context of their time. It will try to give answers to questions such as: What/who were Kaiser's sources of inspiration? How successful was Kaiser in reviving the science of astronomy in The Netherlands, and how did he bring this about? What scientific goals did he try to reach? How unique were his scientific methods, and how were they received?
Given the fact that the effect of Kaiser's methods and ideas extend far beyond his lifetime and discipline, we will follow his traces into 19th- and 20th-century Dutch science (J.A.C. Oudemans, H.A. Lorentz, J. Bosscha, J.D. van der Waals, H. Kamerlingh Onnes).

Method

For this project we will use published as well as unpublished sources. Kaiser's articles and books will serve as a source for analysing his activities in science and popularisation, whereas his correspondence and his other papers (as kept in the archives of e.g. Leiden Observatory and the Leiden University Library) are essential for tracing the origin of his ideas.


Literature

  • Elly Dekker: Een procesverbaal van verhoor, in: Gewina 13, 1990
  • P. van Geer: Frederik Kaiser, een woord van herinnering. Leiden, A.W. Sijthoff, 1872
  • Gijsbert van Herk, Herman Kleibrink en Willem Bijleveld: De Leidse Sterrewacht. Vier eeuwen wacht bij dag en bij nacht. Zwolle, Uitgeverij Waanders / De Kler, 1983
  • J. de Jong: Frederik Kaiser, in: Mannen van beteekenis in onze dagen, deel 7, afl. 4. Haarlem, Kruseman & Tjeenk Willink, 1876
  • J.A.C. Oudemans: Levensschets van Frederik Kaiser, in: Jaarboek der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen, 1875 (bevat ook: Chronologische tafel der werken van F. Kaiser)
  • Huib J. Zuidervaart: Van `Konstgenoten' en Hemelse Fenomenen. Nederlandse sterrenkunde in de achttiende eeuw. Rotterdam, Erasmus Publishing, 1999


home

Petra van der Heijden
vdheijden@yahoo.com

Last modified in 2003