1. Name of program and authors Weak lensing using ALMA Andrew Blain 2. One short paragraph with science goal(s) Gravitational lensing by large-scale structure in the Universe produces systematic distortions in the shapes of galaxies at moderate and high redshifts (by about 0.1-1% for z>0.2). These distortions can be used to map the distribution of dark matter along the line of sight to the lensed object. Currently, this effect is detected statistically with samples of over 10,000 galaxies detected in optical survey fields at least 10 square arcmin in extent. Although ALMA will have exquisite spatial resolution, it will not be able to cover large enough fields to match this work. The ALMA archive would allow this science to be pieced together in field observed for other deep science investigations. There is however, a possible unique niche for ALMA to study weak lensing, along with the astrophysics of gas emission from galaxies at moderate redshifts. By imaging disk galaxies that are close to each other on the sky (separated by an arcmin or less), and by measuring their rotation fields very accurately the distortion can perhaps be detected (Blain 2002 ApJ 570 L54). The most promising way to probe this should be to detect the CO(3-2) line from z~0.5, at which there should be a significant amount of excited gas present, and yet the distance is such that the galaxy is neither too small nor too faint. z~0.5 line-emitting galaxies may also be important for galaxy evolution science. This project may be possible in parallel. 3. Number of sources 1 trial pair of z~0.5 spiral galaxies separated by up to about 1 arcmin on sky (perhaps pre-selected from a deep ALMA survey region). Program could be extended, combining examples in an interconnected web to build up a map of the distortion 1 arcmin at a time. 4. Coordinates: 4.1. Rough RA and DEC No restriction. 4.2. Moving target: no 4.3. Time critical: no 5. Spatial scales: 5.1. Angular resolution (arcsec): 0.03-0.1" at 230 GHz. Best possible resolution is essential to resolve the rotation curve 5.2. Range of spatial scales/FOV (arcsec): 0.03-10" Pair of single fields. 5.3. Single dish total power data: no 5.4. ACA: NO 5.5. Subarrays: no 6. Frequencies: 6.1. Receiver band: Band 6 6.2. Lines and Frequencies (GHz): CO(3-2) redshifted to 230GHz 6.3. Spectral resolution (km/s): 1-2 km/s 6.4. Bandwidth or spectral coverage (km/s or GHz): >500 km/s 7. Continuum flux density: 7.1. Typical value (Jy): 0.1 mJy 7.2. Required continuum rms (Jy or K): N/A 7.3. Dynamic range within image: Not a problem. Bright nearby objects will be avoided 8. Line intensity: 8.1. Typical value (K or Jy): 0.4 Jy km/s integrated over 300 km/s, i.e 1.3 mJy line flux. Point by point probably a 10 km/s wide line. 8.2. Required rms per channel (K or Jy): Need accurate central velocity of the resolved CO line, so 2 km/s resolution required. SG : I don't understand that [0.4 Jy km/s must be split into >100 independent resolution elements. 10-sigma per 2 km/s channel in 100 elements implies=20 need RMS - 400 / ( 10 . 100 . sqrt(5) ) =3D 0.18mJy. ] SG: my own estimate Line flux is 1.3 mJy, so 10 sigma means 0.13 mJy rms noise 8.3. Spectral dynamic range: =20 Not a problem 9. Polarization: no (optional) 9.1. Required Stokes 9.2. Total polarized flux density (Jy) 9.3. Required polarization rms and/or dynamic range 9.4. Polarization fidelity 10. Integration time for each observing mode/receiver setting (hr): 0.13 mJy. RMS in 2 km/s channel in 1 hr is 0.93 mJy, so 51 hours. 2 pointings, 100 hours. Corresponding brightness sensitivity is 1.2 K at 0.05" resolution. 11. Total integration time for program (hr): 100 hrs on a carefully considered target pair of z~0.5 galaxies 12. Comments on observing strategy (e.g. line surveys, Target of Opportunity, Sun, ...): (optional) Review Chris Carilli: OK, integration times checked